How often cloaking actually happens
We set out to show that pages ranking in grey niches cloak more often than pages ranking for ordinary brands. After 1,395 checks we could not show it — but two other differences came out clearly.
Serpward journal
Long-form, written by the people filing the notices. No top-ten lists.
We set out to show that pages ranking in grey niches cloak more often than pages ranking for ordinary brands. After 1,395 checks we could not show it — but two other differences came out clearly.
A page is allowed to answer two requests differently. Cloaking is using that freedom to show the search engine one page and the person who clicks another.
Google names cloaking in its spam policies and treats it as deception rather than a technical error. What that means in practice for the site doing it, and for the brand it is done to.
Every form of cloaking comes down to one decision made on the server: which visitor is this. Five things it can look at, and what each one takes to detect.
Most rejected notices are not refused. They are simply never answered. The difference between the two is what was attached, and it can be listed.
A search made in Berlin on a phone and the same search made in Almaty on a desktop are two different documents. Checking one of them says nothing about the other.
You report a page and are told there was nothing on it. There was. It was shown to the search engine and withheld from you, and the notice was closed as mistaken.
Evidence is usually gathered when someone sits down to write the notice. By then the page has had days to change. The capture belongs at the moment the page is found.
The platform knows what a partner sent and what they were paid. It does not know what their page said, where it ranked, or whether it stood above you on your own name.